By M H Bala Subrahmanya
Technology for MSMEs: Technological obsolescence and sub-optimal scale are 2 seriously distinguishing functions of Indian MSMEs, which primarily consist of micro, casual business. Therefore, policymakers in India have 2 consistent difficulties to the modernization of the MSME sector in the nation, particularly, very first how to speed up technological upgradation and modernization of more and more MSMEs?, and 2nd, how to make it possible for more and more MSMEs to broaden their scale of production (for their progressive development)?
While these 2 difficulties hold excellent for the whole MSME sector, they are extreme in the context of micro-enterprises, both in metropolitan and rural India. In truth, both these difficulties are interlinked. If Indian policymakers be successful in causing a gradually increasing number of MSMEs to choose modernization and innovation upgradation, it is most likely to lead to their growth of scale. Alternatively, if more and more MSMEs are urged to choose scale growth, it is most likely to lead to their modernization and innovation upgradation. In other words, it is not likely to achieve one without the other.
Technology upgradation and modernization is rather a seasonal goal of India’s SSI policy up to 2006, and that of MSME policy considering that 2006. However, we have actually not attained much success on this front, either at the nationwide level or at any of the local levels. Resource shortage in the MSME sector at big is mainly viewed to be the significant accountable element for this. Given their weak internal resources, they are not likely to appeal to and win over external investors (personal or public). Given this, it is required to consider over what can promote MSME scaling up and how to finetune our MSME policies appropriately. The scaling up of MSMEs is essential to improving efficiency and achieve inclusive development. In numerous nations, making it possible for MSMEs to take development chances with time is a policy top priority to address low efficiency development and widening wage and earnings spaces.
One method of handling resource shortage is to motivate ‘digitalization’ through the adoption of ICT tools to help production and marketing. Recent proof (in the context of OECD nations) reveals that the usage of digital tools allows even micro business to gain access to global markets. However, even in industrialized nations, relative to big companies, SMEs’ uptake of ICT is lower, and they deal with greater barriers to the adoption of a number of digital innovations in their functional activities. The adoption of ICT tools in Indian MSMEs is restricted, to state the least, though exact stats are not offered.
Given the academic background of owners and the locational background of Indian microenterprises, the difficulty to acquire ICT tools will stay powerful. To understand the complete capacity of the digital transformation, consisting of to scale up, companies require to update the abilities of employees and management and to buy complementary knowledge-based capital, such as research study and advancement (R&D), information, and brand-new organisational procedures. This requires financial investment capital, which the MSMEs do not have anyhow. This simplifies to the gain access to and accessibility of appropriate finance for the sector.
But MSMEs, in basic, do not have internal monetary strength as much as quickly available external sources of capital (for modernization-cum-scale growth). Even in industrialized nations, troubles in accessing finance are commonly acknowledged as one of the significant challenges to beginning and growing a service. Lack of finance avoids MSMEs from buying ingenious jobs, enhancing their efficiency, and taking chances for broadening to get in brand-new markets.
Subscribe to Financial Express SME newsletter now: Your weekly dosage of news, views, and updates from the world of micro, little, and medium business
In truth, the development procedure of MSMEs can take various rates and types consisting of natural (i.e., internally created) and non-organic development (i.e., through mergers and acquisitions, joint endeavors, and alliances). But in all these, the policy can contribute in making it possible for MSMEs to upgrade highly and scale up. The policy can support MSME innovation upgradation and scale-up, by cultivating a vibrant service environment that helps with entrepreneurship and allows companies of all sizes to reach their complete capacity, consisting of through much better combination in worldwide markets and worth chains. Some of the proper policy efforts are as follows:
First and primary, enhanced gain access to to finance is required to increase the extensive technological transformation of MSMEs throughout the nation. In credit markets, unfavorable choice and ethical risk are intensified in the event of micro-enterprises that lack any loan history or security to protect a loan. Due to their greater threat profile, micro business likewise generally experience greater loan rejection rates than the rest. The “financing gap” impacting micro business remains in truth frequently a “growth capital gap”.
Empirical proof reveals that SMEs that are more depending on external finance grow reasonably quicker in nations with more industrialized monetary markets, i.e. where SMEs can access a variety of alternative funding instruments. Appropriate gain access to to finance likewise enhances the post-entry efficiency of companies, even when managing for the size of entrants. But in numerous nations consisting of India, there are couple of options to standard financial obligation for MSMEs.
In this context, the case of Austria is notable. Austria’s federal advancement and funding bank for the promo and funding of business uses assurances of mezzanine financial investments in SMEs focused on modernization, growth, or acquisition of other business. In truth, in India, we require an unique MSME Technology Finance Corporation (MSME-TFC) with branches in all MSME clusters, followed by opening branches in all district head office in the nation. Such an organization should solely concentrate on the advancement of brand-new innovation through R&D, commercialization of brand-new innovations (from market or college organizations), and updating of making procedures of MSMEs. At least 10% of their loaning need to be dedicated to technological – product/process – developments. They can present project-based financing of digitalization of MSMEs too.
Secondly, getting and maintaining effectively gifted personnels is a difficulty for MSMEs. To cater to the unique skill requirements of MSMEs, departments of management in Universities and unique management organizations (in cities and cities, to start with) need to present integrated MBA programs for diploma holders who emerge from Industrial Training Institutes. Such MBA programs should have an unique concentrate on “small and medium businesses” in terms of internships, jobs, case research studies, and application of concepts. These organizations should have tie-ups with MSME associations for their internships, job works along with direct recruitment after their graduation. This can substantially relieve the personnel restrictions of MSMEs. Finally, if innovation, finance, and personnel difficulties are gotten rid of, MSMEs will be able to dominate local to nationwide to global markets slowly and gradually.
M H Bala Subrahmanya is the Professor, Department of Management Studies at Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore. Views revealed are the author’s own.